Post by Pincho Paxton on Apr 10, 2024 11:37:15 GMT
What Went Wrong In Formulas For Black Holes?
The first thing that went wrong was the Cavendish Experiment where people used their imaginations to think that mass is attracted to mass. Mass moves towards holes in space, and holes in space can exist independently, or be created inside particles where spin creates a hole in space.
Holes in space can be created when gravity gets trapped towards a point, because gravity flows through space like a liquid, and when it collides it moves towards its area of least resistance which can be sideways, but trapped from 6 points it will scale down as its area of least resistance. Gravity scaling down creates a hole in space. Mass will move towards holes in space that are invisible which gives you Dark matter.
There is a relationship to mass however that holes exist inside mass, so formulas using m1 m2 still work most of the time even though they are wrong. When a star becomes super compacted it can create a hole in space, because gravity gets trapped in those patterns. You don't have a bending of spacetime, and the mass is just a guide, but you have a labyrinth of holes. If you take the mass away the holes are still the area of least resistance for gravity, you don't need the mass exactly, you just need gravity to move towards the holes. This is where galaxies come into the picture.
Galaxies can have supermassive black holes without mass, just because gravity collided at those points randomly. A test of mass just means to look for a gathering of mass towards holes, so a test of mass includes a test of holes. But a test of holes doesn't mean a test of mass. This just means that m1 m2 is messing with cause and effect, it also breaks quantum physics, because you need the holes in quantum physics.
Another addition to physics without mass is that you can smear black holes, because you don't need the mass, you just need gravity to chase its area of least resistance... holes in space.
So if space can have holes in it then it is a substance?
Space can be a very resistant substance, but because matter is made from holes in space it will not have resistance to matter. We remove the resistance of space with our labyrinth of holes so that space wants to move towards us as we move towards it. In a situation where both space, and matter want to move towards each other you get inertia through space, and also gravity is scaling down to escape from the matter, so there is no reason for resistance. But space is resistant to space which gives you forces towards matter made from holes in space. So Dark Matter can be smeared black holes, because black holes are holes in space which can be spread through space. Mass is not required.
What is mass then?
Gravity has spin when it collides, and the spin is mass. Resistance to movement is to spin at a stationary point, and mass is resistance to movement. The spins bump each other like 'Battling Tops' this creates matter from basically nothingness. You don't need the Big Bang, you have matter created from space.
Basically any formula with m1 m2 is wrong, and that's what went wrong with Black Holes.
Pincho Paxton
The first thing that went wrong was the Cavendish Experiment where people used their imaginations to think that mass is attracted to mass. Mass moves towards holes in space, and holes in space can exist independently, or be created inside particles where spin creates a hole in space.
Holes in space can be created when gravity gets trapped towards a point, because gravity flows through space like a liquid, and when it collides it moves towards its area of least resistance which can be sideways, but trapped from 6 points it will scale down as its area of least resistance. Gravity scaling down creates a hole in space. Mass will move towards holes in space that are invisible which gives you Dark matter.
There is a relationship to mass however that holes exist inside mass, so formulas using m1 m2 still work most of the time even though they are wrong. When a star becomes super compacted it can create a hole in space, because gravity gets trapped in those patterns. You don't have a bending of spacetime, and the mass is just a guide, but you have a labyrinth of holes. If you take the mass away the holes are still the area of least resistance for gravity, you don't need the mass exactly, you just need gravity to move towards the holes. This is where galaxies come into the picture.
Galaxies can have supermassive black holes without mass, just because gravity collided at those points randomly. A test of mass just means to look for a gathering of mass towards holes, so a test of mass includes a test of holes. But a test of holes doesn't mean a test of mass. This just means that m1 m2 is messing with cause and effect, it also breaks quantum physics, because you need the holes in quantum physics.
Another addition to physics without mass is that you can smear black holes, because you don't need the mass, you just need gravity to chase its area of least resistance... holes in space.
So if space can have holes in it then it is a substance?
Space can be a very resistant substance, but because matter is made from holes in space it will not have resistance to matter. We remove the resistance of space with our labyrinth of holes so that space wants to move towards us as we move towards it. In a situation where both space, and matter want to move towards each other you get inertia through space, and also gravity is scaling down to escape from the matter, so there is no reason for resistance. But space is resistant to space which gives you forces towards matter made from holes in space. So Dark Matter can be smeared black holes, because black holes are holes in space which can be spread through space. Mass is not required.
What is mass then?
Gravity has spin when it collides, and the spin is mass. Resistance to movement is to spin at a stationary point, and mass is resistance to movement. The spins bump each other like 'Battling Tops' this creates matter from basically nothingness. You don't need the Big Bang, you have matter created from space.
Basically any formula with m1 m2 is wrong, and that's what went wrong with Black Holes.
Pincho Paxton