Post by Pincho Paxton on Jul 1, 2016 7:05:07 GMT
First a link...
Do fish have vestigial legs?
Now an image of a Salamander, and a Bichir...
Note the nostrils, and the finger limbs, and the frill along the back. In my version of physics gravity is an inflow like strings, and magnetism is an outflow like tubes. The strings thread the tubes, and that creates male, and female type physics, it also creates nostrils, and toes, and frills
So the worm leaves the sea, and then the Salamander is born, and the salamander changes into pretty much everything else including fish. The Bichir looks like a close relative of the salamander, but the gravity, and magnetism have swapped places. The nostril holes are now strings, and the toes of the salamander have inverted into fins, frills have grown outwards. It seems like the metamorphic physics of the salamander have reversed, and indeed fish do have vestigial legs that have reversed physics.
Pincho Paxton
Do fish have vestigial legs?
Now an image of a Salamander, and a Bichir...
Note the nostrils, and the finger limbs, and the frill along the back. In my version of physics gravity is an inflow like strings, and magnetism is an outflow like tubes. The strings thread the tubes, and that creates male, and female type physics, it also creates nostrils, and toes, and frills
So the worm leaves the sea, and then the Salamander is born, and the salamander changes into pretty much everything else including fish. The Bichir looks like a close relative of the salamander, but the gravity, and magnetism have swapped places. The nostril holes are now strings, and the toes of the salamander have inverted into fins, frills have grown outwards. It seems like the metamorphic physics of the salamander have reversed, and indeed fish do have vestigial legs that have reversed physics.
Pincho Paxton