|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Jul 9, 2016 19:58:31 GMT
There are no peers for my version of physics, and that makes it difficult for me to appreciate scientists, or idolise anyone. However, I can appreciate the fascination of science, and wanting to know how things work. Feynman had an appreciation of science that I can relate to, but if I told him my theories he would tell me to go away the same as any other scientist. This reluctance towards wanting to know my theories is due mainly to mistakes in science, and not my fault.
I will go through some Feynman lectures, and add to them, or correct them!
This lecture first...
So firstly photons. What is a particle?
My version of physics explains a particle with a locator which is a quantum hole in space. Gravity collides at the dot of the hole to re-ignite the hole in a chain reaction like a flame. So the click, click on a detector is the re-ignition of a quantum hole through a collision of gravity. Gravity then has two options of escaping this collision...
1/ The X/Z axis which is a spin axis.
2/ The Y axis which is a string axis.
If you add the X/Z, and Y axis all together you get an icosahedron of holes, and gravity treats the holes as areas of least resistance. The multiplied spin around all of these holes creates a particle which changes the icosahedron into a sphere due to rotations of the icosahedron.
The central hole has a radius which signifies colour with choices of escape routes. Gravity is a shift towards blue in the Y axis, but gravity collides in the hole, and escapes as magnetism. Magnetism is a shift towards red through the X/Z axis with spin around the hole to create a tube.
The shapes of these collisions, and escape routes are the tube, and the string. So photons are a particle with a fractal produced by the particle stacking system of quantum holes due to gravity collisions which escape as magnetism.
2% reflects off water according to the lecture. To get the reflection we need the quantum holes to rotate the outflow towards us. You can imagine that transparency allows the quantum holes to propagate gravity, and magnetism in a x shaped fashion, because a particle stacking system of water will be 2,1,2,1,2,1, and those are all icosahedron stacked on top of each other, and a 2D hexagon stacking system. So you get these zig-zags propagating through the water. You can build interference patterns from the particle stacking system physics.
So the 2% reflection is to get a series of stacked quantum holes to propagate back outwards by rocking an icosahedron all the way around whilst trapping the flow of gravity. That also explains why things can float in water.
I will continue this thread as time goes by.
Pincho Paxton
|
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Jul 9, 2016 22:14:07 GMT
There are the two polarities which are the physics of gravity, and magnetism, and gravity has a blue shift, and magnetism has a red shift. Magnetism is a hole, and gravity is a filler, so gravity strings magnetism into tubes. When you combine gravity, and magnetism together You get 1 + -1 = quro. Quro is the string of gravity, and magnetism combined as a bridge. The bridge is a propagator that moves locality over a distance to give zero result at its previous distance. Quro replaces zero with a length, but still works as zero locally.
So the bubble of washing up liquid can be explained by a distance with a rotational icosahedron of gravity, and magnetism combined.
Gravity = 1
Magnetism = -1
Together they create Quro
You have additive, and destructive interference following these rules. This is not totally probability as said in the video, but the water rotation has physics that are hard to calculate. The propagation is through a series of holes which can be 1 or -1 or quro to channel gravity, or magnetism.
Pincho Paxton
|
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Jul 10, 2016 12:35:24 GMT
Video Part 2
Feynman wonders how the photon between two layers knows in advance that there will be a second layer to determine the outcome of the light reflecting or not. What you can do in that case is to form the answer between the two layers of reactivity... in the middle. The mid-point is where destructive interference can occur, and also where additive interference can occur, so you can use that to solve the problem. Destructive interference is mistaken for a wave property, but is infact a quantum property of a hole, and a filler.
Pincho Paxton
|
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Jul 10, 2016 13:05:46 GMT
Then you get to the part with the mirror, and the chance that you will get a reflection from various angles. Feynman uses a rotating arrow to explain this phenomenon, and a rotating arrow is a good example, because the Y axis that light uses for reflection can rotate as a string like a rotating arrow. Therefore the analogy of a rotating arrow is an almost exact copy of reality.
Pincho Paxton
|
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Jul 10, 2016 16:38:09 GMT
Part 3
Feynman first talks about detecting the surfaces with atoms that change when they interact with a photon, and he says that the interference pattern disappears because you are asking a different question. It seems that Feynman likes the fun of things being complicated, and in fact forces that preference to occur. What I said before was that the interference pattern happens inbetween the two surfaces, and that is a pattern made by gravity, and magnetism. The gravity, and magnetism are ejected by the atoms which are being observed, but need to be rotated in the Y axis to collide at a mid-section. An observer however also rotates the Y axis, and that happens in the two slit experiment as well. So the rotation of the Y axis to create a collision at a mid section is disturbed. The collision between gravity, and magnetism is a collision of +1 and -1 which is the interference pattern required. Atoms rotate this Y axis when other axis are blocked in the X/Z, and an observer blocks the other X/Z axis so the Y axis is altered. The interference pattern is that magnetism is a hole, and gravity is a filler, and combined they create a flat surface. You can use an igloo as the same example...
You dig a hole to build a mound otherwise you have flat ice... It's not wave mechanics. In quantum physics it is propagation mechanics, and it is easy to propagate through holes, but difficult to propagate through filled holes.
Pincho Paxton
|
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Jul 10, 2016 16:56:44 GMT
 Now we need to amplify the light without using wave physics, we need additive interference. Using gravity, and magnetism to replace wave physics the amplification of light has to do with a quantum hole radius, and a combination of quro physics. Quro replaces zero like so... Zero is wrong: Introducing QuroQuro is zero with a scale, direction, and speed propagation. By combining the different ways that gravity can be combined with magnetism you get sums... 1 + -1 = Quro(1) 2 + -2 = Quro(2) You can amplify interference with a growing hole to compact more light inside, and at the same time propagate across the hole in a single bound, because its scale has increased by a quro. That is like reversed wormhole physics. Pincho Paxton |
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Jul 10, 2016 17:34:23 GMT
The next point of view is that electrons behave the same way as photons, they follow the same rules. It's not that difficult to find out why...
...I worked it out like this...
Gravity is a constant, so to make gravity a constant you need sums that work with orbits...
1/ A boat moves through water with a bow wave, and a wake
2/ Suns can be seen with a bow shock ahead of them.
3/ 1 is a filler, and -1 is a hole
4/ Build an igloo example.
5/ Iron filings move towards magnets
6/ Gravity moves objects together
7/ Light moves though a vacuum and retains its information
8/ The universe has a red shift
9/ planets are fairly spherical
10/ suns are fairly spherical
11/ Galaxies can be spiral, or elliptical
12/ Most galaxies contain black holes
13/ The two slit experiment
I put all of the information together.
You get this...
An electron is a hole filling with gravity as a flow force. A photon can propagate towards a hole with a flow force. Gravity must move backwards against the bow of a moving body until it maintains a constant with a bow shock event. The wake must also compensate to speed up to catch up with the Earth.
If an electron, and photon use opposite physics they will look the same anyway.
Therefore everything has to be made from holes, and fillers working together, and as opposites, and like treadmill you can hold physics at a constant using opposite forces. In the case of water, and a boat the forces do not equal out because atoms have trapped gravity in a flow force towards a quantum hole which alters a boat physics over water. Atoms do not behave normally in other words.
Pincho Paxton
|
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Jul 17, 2016 17:08:08 GMT
So I am now at Part 3... 1:05
Feynman is talking about electrons interacting with particles out of sync with time, and then he mentions the Positron.
So particles in my version of physics are not fundamental, because they are made by gravity, and magnetism and held in place by quantum holes. The quantum holes are held open by gravity spin, and gravity collisions. A gravity collision creates a chain of gravity collisions, and we call those particles.
So the electron interacting with the positron works in my version of physics like this...
1/ Electron = hole = Magnetism = Torus
2/ Positron = filler = gravity collision = String
The electron is being disturbed by a gravity collision at a point ahead of its path.
3/ Time = The length of a Quro
Feynman said it would be OK if the formula included zero, but zero doesn't really exist, it is a mistake. I have replaced zero with quro to fix problems with zero. What Feynman has really found at 1:05 is a problem with zero.
Pincho Paxton
|
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Jul 17, 2016 17:38:42 GMT
Part 3: 1:25
Feynman...
Just missing gravity as a flow force colliding at points, and the reason that gravity is missing in this way is because Feynman uses attractive forces, and pull forces.
Soooo close but no cigar.
Also the physics are a bit dodgy, because they are mechanics with no mechanism explained.
Pincho Paxton
|
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Jul 17, 2016 19:16:07 GMT
Video Part 4...
Cancelling out infinity is really happening before the number is put in, because mass is created by negative mass. Gravity moves towards negative mass as the area of least resistance, then it blocks pathways with a membrane of magnetism, and the whole thing combined with cause, and effect towards the flow direction is mass.
So the negative number that Feynman uses is negative mass, and it was the negative mass that created the particle, not a Big Bang, It was a little bang of infinite gravity, and the Big Bang physics are really the outflow of magnetism, just like fire creates smoke.
Pincho Paxton
|
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Jul 17, 2016 19:26:17 GMT
Then Feynman gives an account of a tiny distance between particles that makes the maths easier to understand, but he says that the distance has 80 decimal places. Negative mass is actually combined with mass as a hole, and filler, so you have a membrane inverted to a solid, and a solid that can invert into a membrane. This situation is that a negative mass hole is a location, or a locator...
The hole = the location = negative mass
The filler fills the location = mass
The distance therefore is a mistake in the English language, because physics can share the same location so long as they are inverted to each other like a negative.
80 decimal places = mistake in the English language
Feynman actually utters the words...
Nothing wrong with negative energy, it is negative mass... it is fine.
Pincho Paxton
|
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Jul 17, 2016 20:12:04 GMT
Maybe I should go into negative energy, and negative mass in more detail...
Gravity is a quantization of space that propagates by bumping neighbours along in a series of movements that all create a reversed propagating hole like a game of sliding squares. If gravity is 1 then the reversed propagating hole is -1. What you don't really notice in sliding squares is that there is a hole for every square plus a spare hole, so there are 16 holes, and 15 squares... the hole however is a single hole 16 times the size of a square. Mass is divided up in the same way, that a backdrop is divided by gravity which spins to create membrane walls of speed, this means that scale is a result of spin, and spin alone divides up negative mass holes. Atoms therefore are all the same size, because of the same spin, and colours are a result of the spin holes. This allows for negative energy to share a location with energy, and negative mass to share a location with mass. This allows for propagation of an object like the Earth to exist as a stroboscopic event of hole propagation, followed by energy.
Pincho Paxton
|
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Jul 17, 2016 20:52:15 GMT
Part 4: 55:30
And you keep introducing new particles, but my particles are created by spin that divides up a backdrop. The backdrop ends up as a stacking system of sphere, because it is divided up by spins, and bumps which average out...
a large area is hit more often
a small area is hit less often
= Entropy.
Which divides space up equally eventually, and that quantization evolves into better gravity propagation which is more fractal than before. You can get these repeating biological life forms called humans based on the divisions in space.
What holds everything together therefore is quantum holes that become fractals.
Pincho Paxton
|
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Jul 28, 2016 18:21:14 GMT
Part 4 about...1:10 Feynman starts talking about gravity. Gravity has a very small force he says...
To explain this small force you oppose it with magnetic outflows as you are held in your seat, and this opposite force leaves a remainder which is the weak force. If you think of magnetism as a rainbow then the compensation factor is a negative rainbow, and so gravity is not really constant at all, but this remainder is a constant. In fact as you get old you experience stronger gravity, and it is this stronger gravity that you cannot fight against. There is a nucleus where gravity meets, and the nucleus has forces that are not constant, and can be destructive, along with destructive magnetism. But when you look at both of them combined all you see is a weak force.
Pincho Paxton
|
|
