Post by Pincho Paxton on Dec 1, 2016 18:51:01 GMT
I'm not really a big fan of posting Conspiracy Theories, but after many years of research into this subject it seems to me that man has not walked on the Moon. I'm not just talking about the shadow dependencies, and wind blowing the flag, I'm talking about my own discoveries of possible mistakes in the physics of the Moon.
Here are some of my own examples...
Hammer, and Feather drop...
I don't think that this video helps to solve the conspiracy theory.
1/ The hammer looks like polystyrene.
2/ So the feather could be made to match the polystyrene.
3/ The hammer is dropped with the heavy end downwards not sideways.
4/ The handle has some sort of lump on it.
So if anything it adds to the conspiracy theory.
So the lump on the handle allows for cancelling out some of the rotation towards the ground to hide the fact that this is the Earth. The polystyrene looking hammer allows you to add weight to the feather so that the two things match up. The physics of a hammer fall are still not demonstrated in that case, and so I am not happy at people pretending that we understand those physics fully due to this video.
Irrefutable Proof for Moon Landing - Lunar Gravity
This video is also misleading as all of the mathematical effort ignores the obvious. why is someone who is working out all of these formulas missing the obvious? You cannot work out the gravity from the videos, because the bags could contain helium. So the actual consistent physics in the videos are the movement of the humans which we have evolved to recognise better than anything else. Our brains are wired to recognise these movements so all you have to do is speed up the video footage until you recognise the correct physics for humans on Earth. Then you look at the thrown objects, and you will also recognise those physics based on the film speed. The pendulum has a wave that is strange also, because it looks powered from above. To recognise that something is powered from above you use wave physics which create a tighter curve nearest to a power supply like a small motor device. The amplitude of high frequency will appear near to the motor device fading to low frequency away from the device, and I believe that I see a small amount of that in this video. A natural swing should have a more equal frequency.
But anyway why is there any form of discrepancy in these videos? If I was a mathematical genius I think that I would eliminate helium as a source in the bag without having people walking at 10 miles per hour. It's just odd that the proofs are so strange.
Pincho Paxton
Here are some of my own examples...
Hammer, and Feather drop...
I don't think that this video helps to solve the conspiracy theory.
1/ The hammer looks like polystyrene.
2/ So the feather could be made to match the polystyrene.
3/ The hammer is dropped with the heavy end downwards not sideways.
4/ The handle has some sort of lump on it.
So if anything it adds to the conspiracy theory.
So the lump on the handle allows for cancelling out some of the rotation towards the ground to hide the fact that this is the Earth. The polystyrene looking hammer allows you to add weight to the feather so that the two things match up. The physics of a hammer fall are still not demonstrated in that case, and so I am not happy at people pretending that we understand those physics fully due to this video.
Irrefutable Proof for Moon Landing - Lunar Gravity
This video is also misleading as all of the mathematical effort ignores the obvious. why is someone who is working out all of these formulas missing the obvious? You cannot work out the gravity from the videos, because the bags could contain helium. So the actual consistent physics in the videos are the movement of the humans which we have evolved to recognise better than anything else. Our brains are wired to recognise these movements so all you have to do is speed up the video footage until you recognise the correct physics for humans on Earth. Then you look at the thrown objects, and you will also recognise those physics based on the film speed. The pendulum has a wave that is strange also, because it looks powered from above. To recognise that something is powered from above you use wave physics which create a tighter curve nearest to a power supply like a small motor device. The amplitude of high frequency will appear near to the motor device fading to low frequency away from the device, and I believe that I see a small amount of that in this video. A natural swing should have a more equal frequency.
But anyway why is there any form of discrepancy in these videos? If I was a mathematical genius I think that I would eliminate helium as a source in the bag without having people walking at 10 miles per hour. It's just odd that the proofs are so strange.
Pincho Paxton