Post by Pincho Paxton on Oct 4, 2018 12:59:28 GMT
I've been looking more deeply into evolution, using my established skills to really take a deep look at evolution, and it's not about survival of the fittest.
This is what evolution is about...
...metamorphosis leading towards survival of reduced metamorphosis.
There's a big difference here! The evidence for my version of evolution comes from worms. Worms evolved into everything, so why do we still have worms around today? Not because of survival of the fittest, because the worm are perfectly adapted to their environment, but because the mutation physics in the worms have slowed completely down.
Evolution does not just adapt to its environment, it adapts and overflows those adaptations to dominate its environment. Domination is missing from today's worms, domination existed in ancient worms... and that is the mistake that is currently being made in survival of the fittest. It is survival of the dominant, with every creature becoming gradually more dominant than before, and then having to survive the dominance of the enemy.
Metamorphosis aids the dominant creature, because metamorphosis is faster than evolution. You add metamorphosis, and you get survival of the dominant.
In other words, if you want to write a computer simulation of evolution you should include dominance, and not just adaptation. I don't think that adaptation will grow like dominance will grow.
Pincho Paxton
This is what evolution is about...
...metamorphosis leading towards survival of reduced metamorphosis.
There's a big difference here! The evidence for my version of evolution comes from worms. Worms evolved into everything, so why do we still have worms around today? Not because of survival of the fittest, because the worm are perfectly adapted to their environment, but because the mutation physics in the worms have slowed completely down.
Evolution does not just adapt to its environment, it adapts and overflows those adaptations to dominate its environment. Domination is missing from today's worms, domination existed in ancient worms... and that is the mistake that is currently being made in survival of the fittest. It is survival of the dominant, with every creature becoming gradually more dominant than before, and then having to survive the dominance of the enemy.
Metamorphosis aids the dominant creature, because metamorphosis is faster than evolution. You add metamorphosis, and you get survival of the dominant.
In other words, if you want to write a computer simulation of evolution you should include dominance, and not just adaptation. I don't think that adaptation will grow like dominance will grow.
Pincho Paxton