|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Nov 20, 2018 11:48:47 GMT
|
|
|
Post by mannerme on Mar 24, 2021 1:58:45 GMT
|
|
|
Post by mannerme on Mar 24, 2021 2:02:54 GMT
This forum has been a rich find for me. So I didn't quite understand the shape of atoms. Could you please explain me a bit more clearly?
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Mar 24, 2021 9:40:49 GMT
This forum has been a rich find for me. So I didn't quite understand the shape of atoms. Could you please explain me a bit more clearly? I have to answer using my own physics which means I have to abide by my rules that start with Pincho says... So that people know that I am not using the standard model, and get the Standard Model mixed up with my own ideas... Pincho says... The universe doesn't use any maths, or calculations, so you have to use ideas that can happen by chance, and then repeat the same thing by chance a billion times in a small area. For example a spin around a hole is a torus, and water will often make torus shapes without requiring any calculations. If you rotate the torus around an axis you have resistance in every direction which is spherical. You have a hole in the middle with no resistance which is also spherical. If all the sphere touch you get 'kissing numbers' as shapes that can repeat without calculations. That is like pushing pool balls together, they make a repeating pattern.. 6 balls around 1 ball. That is a hexagon structure that nature can use to build everything from. As you can see you can change Chaos into Order by moving everything together, and gravity moves everything together. Inside all of the sphere you have rotating torus with holes that are the areas of least resistance. The whole thing is built from spin which means that if you could slow it all down the sphere would vanish, and all you would see are torus instead. The atom slowed down therefore would be full of holes, and those holes would be the areas of least resistance, and gravity would be moving towards those holes, and not the mass. The confusion in our maths would be that mass is not 'attractive', but holes are. If gravity winds its way through all of the holes in an atom you get knots, which would be high speed bonding of toroidal areas of least resistance... and no pull forces required. Bonding would mean time stepping so that something can't move with a neighbour blocking its way, but the motion is stepped between the spin of a torus, and the hole in the torus... like threading beads. When you are not allowed to do calculations without first working out the physics that allow order from chaos you are forced to use certain shapes. Pincho Paxton
|
|
|
Post by mannerme on Mar 24, 2021 11:07:59 GMT
This forum has been a rich find for me. So I didn't quite understand the shape of atoms. Could you please explain me a bit more clearly? I have to answer using my own physics which means I have to abide by my rules that start with Pincho says... So that people know that I am not using the standard model, and get the Standard Model mixed up with my own ideas... Pincho says... The universe doesn't use any maths, or calculations, so you have to use ideas that can happen by chance, and then repeat the same thing by chance a billion times in a small area. For example a spin around a hole is a torus, and water will often make torus shapes without requiring any calculations. If you rotate the torus around an axis you have resistance in every direction which is spherical. You have a hole in the middle with no resistance which is also spherical. If all the sphere touch you get 'kissing numbers' as shapes that can repeat without calculations. That is like pushing pool balls together, they make a repeating pattern.. 6 balls around 1 ball. That is a hexagon structure that nature can use to build everything from. As you can see you can change Chaos into Order by moving everything together, and gravity moves everything together. Inside all of the sphere you have rotating torus with holes that are the areas of least resistance. The whole thing is built from spin which means that if you could slow it all down the sphere would vanish, and all you would see are torus instead. The atom slowed down therefore would be full of holes, and those holes would be the areas of least resistance, and gravity would be moving towards those holes, and not the mass. The confusion in our maths would be that mass is not 'attractive', but holes are. If gravity winds its way through all of the holes in an atom you get knots, which would be high speed bonding of toroidal areas of least resistance... and no pull forces required. Bonding would mean time stepping so that something can't move with a neighbour blocking its way, but the motion is stepped between the spin of a torus, and the hole in the torus... like threading beads. When you are not allowed to do calculations without first working out the physics that allow order from chaos you are forced to use certain shapes. Pincho Paxton That's unique idea. So how exactly did you get the idea of holes, spins and knots!
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Mar 24, 2021 11:13:57 GMT
I have to answer using my own physics which means I have to abide by my rules that start with Pincho says... So that people know that I am not using the standard model, and get the Standard Model mixed up with my own ideas... Pincho says... The universe doesn't use any maths, or calculations, so you have to use ideas that can happen by chance, and then repeat the same thing by chance a billion times in a small area. For example a spin around a hole is a torus, and water will often make torus shapes without requiring any calculations. If you rotate the torus around an axis you have resistance in every direction which is spherical. You have a hole in the middle with no resistance which is also spherical. If all the sphere touch you get 'kissing numbers' as shapes that can repeat without calculations. That is like pushing pool balls together, they make a repeating pattern.. 6 balls around 1 ball. That is a hexagon structure that nature can use to build everything from. As you can see you can change Chaos into Order by moving everything together, and gravity moves everything together. Inside all of the sphere you have rotating torus with holes that are the areas of least resistance. The whole thing is built from spin which means that if you could slow it all down the sphere would vanish, and all you would see are torus instead. The atom slowed down therefore would be full of holes, and those holes would be the areas of least resistance, and gravity would be moving towards those holes, and not the mass. The confusion in our maths would be that mass is not 'attractive', but holes are. If gravity winds its way through all of the holes in an atom you get knots, which would be high speed bonding of toroidal areas of least resistance... and no pull forces required. Bonding would mean time stepping so that something can't move with a neighbour blocking its way, but the motion is stepped between the spin of a torus, and the hole in the torus... like threading beads. When you are not allowed to do calculations without first working out the physics that allow order from chaos you are forced to use certain shapes. Pincho Paxton That's unique idea. So how exactly did you get the idea of holes, spins and knots! I was trying to figure out how to build the universe from zero upwards. I came up with 1 + -1 = 0. Which meant that I had some physics to work with.. a filler, and a hole equals zero. So then I could build the universe from nothing, and it was observable in mathematics.
|
|
|
Post by mannerme on Mar 24, 2021 11:16:20 GMT
That's unique idea. So how exactly did you get the idea of holes, spins and knots! I was trying to figure out how to build the universe from zero upwards. I came up with 1 + -1 = 0. Which meant that I had some physics to work with.. a filler, and a hole equals zero. So then I could build the universe from nothing, and it was observable in mathematics. But 1 and -1 does mean something. So the nothing (0) was made of something (1,-1)
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Mar 24, 2021 11:18:21 GMT
I was trying to figure out how to build the universe from zero upwards. I came up with 1 + -1 = 0. Which meant that I had some physics to work with.. a filler, and a hole equals zero. So then I could build the universe from nothing, and it was observable in mathematics. But 1 and -1 does mean something. So the nothing (0) was made of something (1,-1) Yes it just means that you find a fault in the English language. You have to remember that the English language isn't scientific so when we say zero is nothing we are wrong.
|
|
|
Post by mannerme on Mar 24, 2021 11:23:26 GMT
But 1 and -1 does mean something. So the nothing (0) was made of something (1,-1) Yes it just means that you find a fault in the English language. You have to remember that the English language isn't scientific so when we say zero is nothing we are wrong. To be frank, I expected this reply Because even if matter and antimatter collide, we do get energy.
|
|