New theory could explain missing 95 percent of the cosmos

Originally I just wanted to know how the universe works, and then when I started science from scratch I noticed that I was not following the standard model apart from some old ideas like the Aether. When I posted my ideas on science sites I was up against a brick wall. Then I concluded that peer review had a flaw in it that all parties would have the same bias towards the Standard Model. Which means that a complete rewrite of science from scratch would make all peer none existent.

So the system is flawed, so to be recognised first requires that the flaw in the system is recognised.