|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Apr 28, 2013 23:01:27 GMT
So fundamental energy is kinetic, and taken from time as a scalar bounce. A nice neat quantum bounce with no deceleration due to a flip from convex to concave filled by gravity then magnetism. It is the lack of deceleration that allows the bounce to repeat forever. The lack of zero in the system. 1 + -1 = 0 is reality. It takes two states to make a zero state, and if you can switch between the two states without stopping then you will never reach a zero state for energy.
1/ Newton's Kissing Problem.. the 13th ball.
After Newton discovered that you could get 12 balls around a same sized ball, he then puzzled over the gaps. He worked out that there was room for a 13th ball. The 13th ball could never be fitted. This is the chaos that leaves an area of least resistance forever in a scalar field that equals out to same sized particles.
2/ The time bounce.
Create a vector sphere scale 5, and a vector sphere scale -5. They look the same, the physics are inverted. Take a tennis ball, cut it in half, fold the other half inside out. Two halves, with physics that can flip, both the same size more or less. Time uses kinetic energy based on a system that doesn't need to reverse direction to actually reverse direction. It is a trampoline that always bounces, because its zero state doesn't exist. 1 switches to -1, and back to 1 because the geodesic quality of time never flattens out. And as a ball of gravity switching to a ball of magnetism all that is happening is a scalar change. The two ends of a bar magnet are examples of a scalar change bounce. The ends that push apart are pushing against scaled convex curves. The ends that 'APPEAR' to pull are scaled concave spin forces. The forces are polarised together, and only make changes to other particles with the matching poles, and scales.
If you were to use a black Box example of the propagation of all things, you need to include the bow shock of the Black Box in the example. The bow shock is made from the points as holes which are areas for kinetic energy to move into. If you stand in the black box your bow shock matches the black box bow shock. Your bow shock points are spaced relatively to the Black Box. You are both sending the same message. Your second frames match up, and kinetic energy is traversing its way along a fractal towards the bow shock holes.
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Apr 28, 2013 23:01:42 GMT
Space isn't a vacuum or even close...
The fundamental zero particles fill space time head to tail. They then scale down minutely enough as to not make contact. Like a circuit board they are now hidden. The Earth however has no scalar ability, so it makes contact, it makes a circuit board. The electrons are holes in the zero particle field, and so a solid, or mass is actually more like a sponge....
The Earth is a sponge in a surrounding particle field of zero particles. The Earth as a mass uses less matter than space of the same size. The illusion is that we see a negative of reality.
A frictionless spacetime is actually a conveyor spacetime. The Earth as a sponge, or an asteroid, or anything that we call a mass is full of holes that fill with spacetime. If you move towards the zero particles with an atomic structure you are moving as a bubble towards a super liquid. The flow of the liquid through the structure conveys the structure with no net change, and therefore frictionless. The scalar particles which scale down to avoid making contact create a gap that Einstein called the bending of spacetime. It is actually the scaling of space time. The scalar particles then scale back up behind the atomic structure. A scalar bend.
We as humans are human bubbles in a super liquid.
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Apr 28, 2013 23:02:09 GMT
So we have the atoms sliding over a scalar field. What about the photons?
Each zero particle is made from a convex curve, which touches things like atoms, and a concave curve which acts as a hole, and holes usually don't get touched by atoms. But photons can hit the convex side with such force that it becomes a concave side. In fact the propagation of the wave is due to collisions with zero particles which cannot scale out of the way fast enough.
So as the photon is hitting the convex side you need to change that side into a spin in your mind. Now imagine a bent waterfall.
1/ If the bend is towards you when you put your hand under it..... the water gushes out towards you.
2/ If the water is bent concave then the water takes your hand with it into the waterfall.
As the photon bends the convex it experiences slow down, but as it changes the convex to concave it experiences speed up. The incoming gush of water pops the concave back to convex again behind it. Then the photon leaves through concave.
(The photon may actually just be the flip, and the particle may be the gush. So in other words a photon may just be a virtual particle built there, and destroyed in the same location, but recreated by the next pop.)
In a lens this is much more fractal. The centre of a convex lens is the easier choice. In a prism the colours are separated by areas of least resistance.
Red shift is likely to be a scalar shift of the zero particles.
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Apr 28, 2013 23:02:35 GMT
So far, the theory is based on a repeating fractal. The fractal exists, you can see it. You can see it in nature. You can see the relationship between a whirlpool, and a Galaxy spin. You can test pull forces, are they pull forces? Look closely at a chain, it is made up of all push forces. Pull open a door, and you look closely, you are pushing open the door. If another theory comes along that is similar, will it find the relationship with the fractal? The relationship with Newtons Kissing Problem? Lets try to break the relationship with the fractal.. The millipede... It doesn't have 12 points per leg, or 6 points, it has two legs on either side of a body section. So how is it a Newton's Kissing Fractal? Each body section is closed off at the ends. newton's kissing Problem for 1D is 2 balls either side of 1 ball. If there is a tiny bit more space you can add two legs per side so long as they are squashed in scale. You could try salt, it's a cube... Salt is probably the hardest to fit into the fractal. It has become a motionless version of the fractal. The electrons are trapped, time seems to be stuck. The Octopus... 8 legs, no Kissing Problem Fractal has 8 in it. But water exhibits some changes to Newton's Kissing Problem. Water has a pressure from the sides. The side pressure is combined with the Y pressure of Gravity. So lets use X / Y pressure. The forces then cause a diagonal fracture in Newton's Kissing Problem. The diagonal fracture squeezes points together. So an Octopus is actually a 12 legged creature squeezed in the middle to become an 8 legged creature with an enlarged head where the pressure squeezes into. The squeeze also pushes the Octopus testicles into its head. So Fish are often squeezed in the middle to become flat, and our hands become flat fins. All of these changes are stored in DNA, and so the physics don't actually need to apply anymore. A baby's feet are flat from gravity before it has walked, so the changes of Newton's Kissing Problem are sometimes evolved into a body with no forces acting on it at all. If that isn't enough for you let's go up in scale to something really big. You will find a hexagonal fractal in Images like this one. Just overlay a hexagonal grid over it, and bend the grid concavely... www.bbc.co.uk/science/space/universe/questions_and_ideas/dark_matter/A new theory is not going to be as complete as this theory. Although you can add to this theory.
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Apr 28, 2013 23:03:02 GMT
Time, and Time again...
Time is central to all points, and is like a Scalar Geyser that propagates kinetic energy into physics. The snowflake is an example of Time In. The Sun is an example of Time Out. The difference between a hot sphere, and a cold hexagon is time.
The chaos of time is the 13th ball that can never be fitted into Newton's Kissing Problem.
More chaos is created by energy cells blocking other energy cells. Look at lightening, it forks when an energy cell is blocked. The same thing with a tree. Limited angles of 60 degree are still apparent at this scale, but are dwindling through the smoothing out of the fractal.
So if this is all a fractal what about free will?
I have a Theory right here that 7 Billion people didn't think of. Plus all of the people that ever lived. I don't follow cause, and effect, I don't use 'PULL' just because all of the causes said 'USE PULL'. I don't have to follow a leader. I appear to have Free Will, and I'm not just being random. I can play the piano, and my songs are original, I can paint, I write computer games, and I can invent new things.
I figured out the theory years ago, about 2003. Nobody bothered to follow up on it. Even if I try to implant a cause into others, nobody is taking the bait of the real TOE.
This is the real Theory Of Everything, and yet the free will to accept it seems to be a bit dormant for my liking. People seem to want to follow the Standard Model even if I prove that pull doesn't exist, and the standard model is based on pull. Newton Invented science as a mathematical proof. So from the very first use of science as mathematics there was a fault in it.. 'Pull'. Which created an error in the Force formula that uses mass. Which made Einstein use a pull force in the Big Bang.
But I ignored all of it.
Does Free Will exist?
It does in me.
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Apr 28, 2013 23:03:43 GMT
So, did anyone put a concave hexagon grid over the NASA picture of Dark Matter? This is what you would see... Too good to be true? Probably yes. I don't expect the fractal to be quite that obvious. There was another picture posted a few years later, and NASA said that the new picture definitely did not contain a fractal unlike the first. But when I inspected the new picture it had the same fractal, but you had to apply a bit more of a concave curve to the grid. Here is a link, read it for yourself.. it has the same fractal... www.space.com/17234-universe-fractal-large-scale-theory.html
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Apr 28, 2013 23:07:40 GMT
So, according to the evidence so far, a quantum set of 12 particles around 1 particle, maintains its shape all the way up to infinity. The particle stacking system uses Newton's Kissing problem, which averages out to a hexagon shape from any direction in 3D. The structure of spacetime then looks a bit like this... And Spin Spin is that shape rotating.
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Apr 29, 2013 14:34:31 GMT
And when the particles touch the energy is passed along like a circuit board. And the message can be a photon. The fractal can be determined how each set of physics works. I said that a photon is a message passed by a sort of curved waterfall. An outward curve holds together until it is touched, and then it releases energy like a spray outwards. An inward curve blasts energy inwards. The fractal can be seen in some space anomalies... (I edited this image to make the bubbles clearer to the human eye.)
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Apr 29, 2013 14:35:28 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Apr 29, 2013 14:35:51 GMT
Here's a question? If the Universe is a fractal, what is the difference between Dark Matter, and Grey Matter? Well if you look at the picture I posted earlier of Dark Energy placement in the Universe, and now look this article. there is not much difference... www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/03/130307124754.htm... and in my mind there is a planet called Earth ... and on this Earth I sit ... and I sit and I think of Dark Energy ... and in this Dark Energy there is a planet called Earth ... and on that Earth I sit, and think ... and in my mind there is a planet called Earth Just a poetic interlude.
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Apr 29, 2013 14:36:12 GMT
What is the constant C?
When you use a Newtons Cradle the balls have a similar size, and a set radius, and all propagate through a force, and the energy escapes. The speed drops because the energy escapes. That would be the Convex waterfall effect escaping.
The physics of C are similar to a Newton's Cradle, but the energy doesn't escape. A set distance is propagated through. Time acts as a piston in the middle. The piston value...
5,4,3,2,1,-1,-2,-3,-4,-5 adds up to zero. So zero is lost.
So in a normal Newtons Cradle energy is lost in the X/Y/Z
Inverted physics forces the energy into a hole, and back into the system again. The hole is where X / Y /Z all meet up at a single point... Time.
Time which has a bounce with no loss of speed. The propagator of all things.
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Apr 29, 2013 14:37:09 GMT
Relativity stored in a fractal framework. You stand on a train. The train has a bow shock which is the scaling of space time. Newton's Kissing problem is 12 balls around 1 ball. The train scales down the centre ball of 12 to make points in space time, because the middle ball has nowhere to escape to. The other scalar particles can escape if they are fast enough relative to the train speed. Otherwise bunching occurs. Bunching traps more scalar particles, they cannot escape. There are more points created by bunching, more scaling down, less resistance from forward motion due to a fragmented space time. Bunching is due to acceleration, once the speed becomes regular the bunching rolls through its own newly created holes in the bow shock areas. Time as a geyser spring is under pressure. Time dilation occurs due to the restriction of forward flow from a hole. The loss of forward flow also takes pressure off the atoms. Contraction throughout the train is due to loss of internal time pressure. Time shrinks, time is a propagator of atoms. The electrons as holes have a flow of incoming gravity from the train movement. This spins around the electrons, and expands the holes. Magnetism flows forwards as a push force. G force flows backwards as a push force. Magnetism is another aspect of the scaling of space time down. Colour shifts are related to scale shifts. A wave is a scalar wave, so a red shift is a scale up, and a blue shift is a scale down. At the front of the train there is a scale down. At the back of the train there is a scale up. A rainbow is therefore a scalar rainbow. The size to wave relationship is through individual particle pockets which are aligned to become waves. A rainbow looks like a curved packet of Rice Crispies at the quantum scale. The small crispies shrunk to fall to the bottom of the big Crispies in the bag looks similar to photon pockets. A person standing on this train experiences similar bow shock forces. A person standing outside of the train has none of this Data. So the frames are now frozen. If the train is accelerating the zero particles change from convex to concave and forming the holes as an area of least resistance ahead of the train. Concave zero particles have an inward flow of time particles, and this flow acts as a bond (The waterfall is concave, you put your hand in it and your hand moves into the waterfall. It looks like a pull force, but is a quantum push force.) The zero particles can't escape under acceleration pressure. Time as a spring is under pressure. Magnetic bubbles are forming from electron spin speeds coming from increased G force. Zero particles are scaling down gravity into magnetism. Train reaches a constant speed. The convex particles now bump away as less become concave. The convex geyser effect of time has regained momentum. The thing is to think of the physics acting out Relativity as a Quantum flow. Two people do not share the entire flow of physics. The single frame is flowing towards the next frame. Do not confuse time with Past, Present, and Future however. That's a big mistake. Time is always present time. The time dilation of a clock is a restriction of time energy. Time energy is a force limited to a small atomic sphere. It cannot escape it's own sphere, it's trapped. There is no arrow, there is a scalar sphere reducing to a snowflake, then into a point. If you test out the time physics on ageing then you get a result from limiting the energy loss of the test subject. That's not a time result in the sense of Past, Present or Future. Time in most cases does not exist. It is just a force the happens inside a point where it propagates the X /Y /Z forces. A scaler vortex of Russian Dolls. A geyser where the water can fold inside out on itself... a super liquid, condom, geyser flow force. It is quite complicated. And it is easy to make a mistake in this mixture of physics. So I may have missed something, or got something backwards. It's easy to get something backwards when a particle can take on the opposite physics by folding inside out... Water scales up into ice, and ice scales down. The physics reverse. Water can be crushed into magnetism as well.
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Apr 29, 2013 14:37:51 GMT
The image above of a photon stream, spin, and scalar change is not totally at the Quantum Scale. I mean that there are smaller physics happening that aren't in the picture, quite important details actually... Spin Spin... Newtons Kissing Problem has a hidden 13th ball that can never be fitted. Zero particles perform scalar changes which are like mini waterfalls. The exchange of energy between scalar particles creates scale equalization. So Newton's Kissing Problem in this case uses same sized particles, and the waterfall flow is Time which is smaller, and builds the same sized particles. The 13th ball that can never be fitted allows all particles to spin around the central particle. That spin is......... Spin Spin. You have a hollow propagator, so it's spin directs the flow invisibly. So what we see has another invisible spin which points energy towards the area of least resistance. In the prism above the spin spin would point towards the largest mass area of the prism, because mass is holes, and holes are electrons. So the spin spin points towards the electrons first, and this is the passageway to the area of least resistance for gravity. Now the spin spin is a very useful physical device. It directs flow, and it creates bonding. The bonding is created by the fact that the spin spin has open ends, but a more closed middle area. It looks like a Gyroscope inverted to be hollow made from Newton's Kissing Problem. The 6 balls surrounding the middle area are the Gyroscope wheel. The other balls 3 at the top, and 3 at the bottom create the Gyroscope arms. You see the bonding in snowflakes, and the locking can rotate very rarely... i.livescience.com/images/i/000/009/281/i02/ig35_snowflakes_10_02.jpgAbove you see a snowflake which normally bonds in lines has a 90 degree rotation through the bonding. Similar things happen in other areas of nature, like trees, and DNA double helix. One of the other important states of this bonding process is in creating the wave.
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Apr 29, 2013 14:38:14 GMT
What is a wave?
A wave is particle bonding through a spin spin. It looks like a line of hollow Gyroscope end to end which propagate energy through touch bonding. Newton's Kissing Problem applies to all of the touch bonding locations. So the touch bonding is often limited to 60 degree angles, or various cases of Newton's Kissing Problem angles. Touch bonding is created by concave effects with concave flow walls which act 'similar' to a pull force. So all waves are created by particles.
The two slit experiment with an observer helps the bonding to take place. So you get spin spin towards the detector. Without an observer the contact of the zero particles is lesser without any bow shocks from the observer to create the concave holes required for bonding. The system can rock without better bonding, so it is like the gyroscopes slowing down on a table, and rocking in this lesser energy state.
The rocking motion creates the waves in the sea. The bonding is weak, it swings around like little bridges that open to let the boats through. Little fishing floats with magnets on the ends is a real model that you could build. If you centrally balance the floats, and use a weak magnet you can get the little waves to happen, and open up. If you can arrange a 60 degree rotation with a hoop, and make sure that you have opposite poles then you can get an even better model.
So that is how a particle converts into a wave, and a line.
Particle Wave Duality.
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Apr 29, 2013 14:38:30 GMT
|
|