Post by Pincho Paxton on Feb 22, 2024 7:22:51 GMT
How Often Do You Use Faith Without Realising It?
The title speaks for itself.
1/ Do you believe in the scientific method?
2/ Do you believe that we evolved from fish?
3/ Do you believe that maths is a form of proof?
4/ Are you an Atheist
5/ Do you think that Einstein was a genius?
6/ Do you believe in pull forces?
7/ Do you believe that you can pull a door open?
8/ Do you think that Isaac Newton was a genius to come up with gravity as a pull force?
I mean 'pulling' a door open is something that you probably do every day, so why didn't you notice that you were pushing the door open? Your hand is either behind the door, or behind the door handle, and if you move something from the back you are pushing. If you are now sitting in a chair try pulling something towards your chair, and then walk to the other side, and push it towards your chair. If you look at your fingers they were likely to be in the exact same place both times. Where did the word 'pull' come into it?
You may think that this is word play, but Isaac Newton used gravity as a pull force, and if he had observed his own hands he would have to say that gravity was a push force, because the word 'pull' shouldn't even exist in physics. So Isaac Newton ignored his own hands.. is that a genius?
So did we evolve from fish? No we evolved from worms. To evolve from fish requires faith in the study of evolution, but we actually do not have any fish ancestry at all. We evolved from worms which went onto land before fish existed. Worms of course do not need to grow legs to go onto land, so they aren't going to wait millions of years for fish to exists, and then grow legs. The worms just wiggled into estuaries. So why isn't this also faith? Because worms have regenerative abilities, they can repair themselves. And evolution happened when the regenerative process accidentally grew arms, and legs on a worm. Worms can also grow teeth when they need to. This mechanism in worms gives you physics to work with in evolution, so instead of faith you now have a mechanism. That isn't faith, and worms crawling onto land instead of growing legs isn't faith.. it's a high probability.
When you aren't using faith you are using mechanics, and people like Richard Dawkins are solely using faith. His version of evolving from fish is faith. Him finding out that we actually evolved from worms to him is a small step, but actually its the elimination of faith. Then he picks another subject 'Atheism', but Earth is a simulation, so atheism isn't safe either. If Earth is a simulation then it was created by Ai, because we use Ai to create everything big, and detailed. Ai in that case is God in the Bible, because the Bible is a book deliberately put into the Earth simulation. Like a cookie warning it tells you that everything you do is being watched, and it will be decided if you will get into Heaven... is that faith? No actually it is a mathematical formula based on probability, and it is 7 Billion to 1 that I am wrong about that...
Earth is a simulation, it can be proven mathematically
So is maths a form of proof? Only if you don't cheat when it comes to observing the physics, and portraying the physics. The Cavendish experiment requires faith, because it's totally invisible like the 'Emperors New Clothes'. People say that they see a pull force (impossible to see a pull force) That mass attracts mass (impossible for mass to attract mass).
Basically you put formulas into a computer, and you use a 'MOVE' command. The MOVE command fixes the mistakes in mass attracting mass. You are having faith in the MOVE command. Mass moves towards holes at the centre of mass, because you can actually observe a sponge, and a vacuum cleaner which have holes to move into. holes in the air, and holes in the sponge. Everything moves towards its area of least resistance, which is why your hands always push, and never pull.
So was Einstein a genius then? Relativity removes all of the resistance from space which is required to move asteroids around. being as everything move from high resistance with flow towards lower resistance he again ignored all of physics to end up with relativity, and he also has mass attracted towards mass. He had faith in Newton, and so Einstein was using faith, and was not a genius. Gravity flows into holes at the nucleus of particles the same a water into a sponge... you use mechanics not faith.
So do you believe in the scientific method?
Maths isn't a form of proof if you just put MOVE into a computer, and it fixes your bad maths. Peer review isn't a good method if the peer all see pull forces in the Cavendish experiment.. you just have the Emperor's New Clothes.
So basically most people just use faith every day. I am eliminating all of faith.
Pincho Paxton
The title speaks for itself.
1/ Do you believe in the scientific method?
2/ Do you believe that we evolved from fish?
3/ Do you believe that maths is a form of proof?
4/ Are you an Atheist
5/ Do you think that Einstein was a genius?
6/ Do you believe in pull forces?
7/ Do you believe that you can pull a door open?
8/ Do you think that Isaac Newton was a genius to come up with gravity as a pull force?
I mean 'pulling' a door open is something that you probably do every day, so why didn't you notice that you were pushing the door open? Your hand is either behind the door, or behind the door handle, and if you move something from the back you are pushing. If you are now sitting in a chair try pulling something towards your chair, and then walk to the other side, and push it towards your chair. If you look at your fingers they were likely to be in the exact same place both times. Where did the word 'pull' come into it?
You may think that this is word play, but Isaac Newton used gravity as a pull force, and if he had observed his own hands he would have to say that gravity was a push force, because the word 'pull' shouldn't even exist in physics. So Isaac Newton ignored his own hands.. is that a genius?
So did we evolve from fish? No we evolved from worms. To evolve from fish requires faith in the study of evolution, but we actually do not have any fish ancestry at all. We evolved from worms which went onto land before fish existed. Worms of course do not need to grow legs to go onto land, so they aren't going to wait millions of years for fish to exists, and then grow legs. The worms just wiggled into estuaries. So why isn't this also faith? Because worms have regenerative abilities, they can repair themselves. And evolution happened when the regenerative process accidentally grew arms, and legs on a worm. Worms can also grow teeth when they need to. This mechanism in worms gives you physics to work with in evolution, so instead of faith you now have a mechanism. That isn't faith, and worms crawling onto land instead of growing legs isn't faith.. it's a high probability.
When you aren't using faith you are using mechanics, and people like Richard Dawkins are solely using faith. His version of evolving from fish is faith. Him finding out that we actually evolved from worms to him is a small step, but actually its the elimination of faith. Then he picks another subject 'Atheism', but Earth is a simulation, so atheism isn't safe either. If Earth is a simulation then it was created by Ai, because we use Ai to create everything big, and detailed. Ai in that case is God in the Bible, because the Bible is a book deliberately put into the Earth simulation. Like a cookie warning it tells you that everything you do is being watched, and it will be decided if you will get into Heaven... is that faith? No actually it is a mathematical formula based on probability, and it is 7 Billion to 1 that I am wrong about that...
Earth is a simulation, it can be proven mathematically
So is maths a form of proof? Only if you don't cheat when it comes to observing the physics, and portraying the physics. The Cavendish experiment requires faith, because it's totally invisible like the 'Emperors New Clothes'. People say that they see a pull force (impossible to see a pull force) That mass attracts mass (impossible for mass to attract mass).
Basically you put formulas into a computer, and you use a 'MOVE' command. The MOVE command fixes the mistakes in mass attracting mass. You are having faith in the MOVE command. Mass moves towards holes at the centre of mass, because you can actually observe a sponge, and a vacuum cleaner which have holes to move into. holes in the air, and holes in the sponge. Everything moves towards its area of least resistance, which is why your hands always push, and never pull.
So was Einstein a genius then? Relativity removes all of the resistance from space which is required to move asteroids around. being as everything move from high resistance with flow towards lower resistance he again ignored all of physics to end up with relativity, and he also has mass attracted towards mass. He had faith in Newton, and so Einstein was using faith, and was not a genius. Gravity flows into holes at the nucleus of particles the same a water into a sponge... you use mechanics not faith.
So do you believe in the scientific method?
Maths isn't a form of proof if you just put MOVE into a computer, and it fixes your bad maths. Peer review isn't a good method if the peer all see pull forces in the Cavendish experiment.. you just have the Emperor's New Clothes.
So basically most people just use faith every day. I am eliminating all of faith.
Pincho Paxton