|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Nov 25, 2013 10:51:24 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Dec 2, 2013 12:13:35 GMT
My theory: In my theory gravity is a flow into holes, and electrons are holes, hence they are negative with the illusion of a pull force. Salt contains trapped electrons, so the introduction of salt is the introduction of gravity flow holes. Water also contains these holes in a spread that allows photons to pass through it, hence water is transparent, and hence you get refraction, because the holes are squished together by pressure, and this displaces the photon alignment. So you have all these attributes to account for to create the ripple effect. By looking at the ripple effect you could say that electrons are altering the directional flow of gravity through the holes. These holes are propagators much like Black Holes, but quantum. They are flow holes for gravity. Electrons when tested appear to be spherical, but this is the flow of particles through the electron holes, and therefore the test of the mass of the electron, and its shape is not really a test of the electron energy contribution. The electron hole is much like a water wheel, and the tests that look for the electron would be the same as a test that looks for the wheel that produces the energy. Instead, the test of mass, and shape is finding the water. Two separate bodies are therefore being called a single body, and this is part of the Quantum confusion. Another part of the confusion that tests the electrons is that the word pull is introduced to the electron energy, and this pull is described as an elastic band grouping together to create pull forces... this is incorrect. The pull is created by a push force into holes, and a spin force around these holes that creates the spherical shape.
So much confusion there, and all due to Isaac Newton using the word 'pull' for gravity. Gravity is a push/ flow force.
So the rings in the end are electron holes moving through the water, and moving gravity with them.
Pincho Paxton
|
|