Post by Pincho Paxton on Aug 28, 2015 8:11:38 GMT
Link...
New theory leads to 'radiationless revolution'
Pincho says...
1 + -1 = 0, so non-zero doesn't matter, but destructive interference does matter. In my theory holes, and fillers cancel each other out, and I like to use an igloo as an example. Build an igloo from flat ice by digging out blocks to build a dome. You end up with flat ice as zero, the dome as +1, and the hole as -1.
Electrons in my version of physics are -1, because they are a hole, and they are a hole because they have a pull force, and only holes have pull forces in my version of physics. Fillers cancel out holes, so a filler is +1, and I have been using spherical fillers in my version of physics. A torus is an effect of a spherical filler... rain hits water for example... the filler causes the torus.
So in my version of physics the explanation in the link is one step out of sync with the real physics. The torus isn't cancelling out the radiation, a spherical filler is cancelling out the radiation, and then the spherical filler is creating a torus, the torus is a ring of destructive interference slightly after its cause which is hidden in invisible physics.
Pincho Paxton sees the invisible!
Pincho Paxton
New theory leads to 'radiationless revolution'
If these two configurations are out of phase then the radiation will be cancelled out, even though the electromagnetic fields are non-zero in the area close to the currents.
Pincho says...
1 + -1 = 0, so non-zero doesn't matter, but destructive interference does matter. In my theory holes, and fillers cancel each other out, and I like to use an igloo as an example. Build an igloo from flat ice by digging out blocks to build a dome. You end up with flat ice as zero, the dome as +1, and the hole as -1.
Electrons in my version of physics are -1, because they are a hole, and they are a hole because they have a pull force, and only holes have pull forces in my version of physics. Fillers cancel out holes, so a filler is +1, and I have been using spherical fillers in my version of physics. A torus is an effect of a spherical filler... rain hits water for example... the filler causes the torus.
So in my version of physics the explanation in the link is one step out of sync with the real physics. The torus isn't cancelling out the radiation, a spherical filler is cancelling out the radiation, and then the spherical filler is creating a torus, the torus is a ring of destructive interference slightly after its cause which is hidden in invisible physics.
Pincho Paxton sees the invisible!
Pincho Paxton