|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Dec 4, 2013 15:08:16 GMT
Link... 'Spooky Action' Builds a Wormhole Between 'Entangled' Quantum ParticlesIt's similar to what I said... Action At A Distance Could Be An Isolated System Read more: greatestminds.freeforums.net/thread/96/action-distance-isolated-system#ixzz2mWEJCHK1...but not exactly the same. My theory still requires propagation by a local source through the wormhole... holes of set distances inside the wormhole. Still C the constant speed (or faster, but not instant). Plus my wormhole needs to be kept stable, so the other side of the galaxy would break it. Although, to be honest I haven't figured out what locality is yet. I stick with locality because the Universe is behaving nicely with locality. If we didn't need locality, it wouldn't exist. The only way to get instantly across a large distance is to put bubbles around both ends, and make the huge bubbles local to each other. Then the membrane can pass the message in one step. C is a step distance, if a step is one foot apart you need 1 foot radius bubbles as propagators with a hole in the middle as a locating hole. C then is incredibly fast to a human, but the photons should also change scale. It's possible that the scale change of the photon is down scaled back to a sensor however. Pincho Paxton
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Dec 6, 2013 12:50:12 GMT
Link... You Can't Get Entangled Without a Wormhole: Physicist Finds Entanglement Instantly Gives Rise to a WormholeYes you get tunnelling, I call it a bridge, but it stretches like toffee, I can't see gravity holding it open for long. You need steps through the tunnel to hold it open. OK a gravity flow might hold the tunnel open, but it has a speed that isn't instant. Gravity is a spherical propagator.. not instant propagation. You can scale gravity up faster than C, and you can have a gravity flow faster than C, but instant is local.... unless... ... Ok a situation where all of the propagations are pre-prepared apart from one might work instantly. Like a fundamental newtons cradle where instead of swinging one ball you swing half of the balls from both sides together. With atoms you lose energy, but fundamentally you don't. Pre-prepared photons. Although pre-prepared sounds possible, I still think that instant is asking a lot. Mathematics doesn't work if you don't know what physics you are using. No, I don't believe the scientific version at all. My version... The photons are already doing whatever they are supposed to be doing before they are observed apart from one link in the chain of events. That link would most likely be a scalar event.
|
|
|
Post by Pincho Paxton on Dec 6, 2013 15:24:11 GMT
|
|