Post by Pincho Paxton on Oct 19, 2015 11:25:41 GMT
Link...
What are nanostars in 2-D superconductor supposed to mean?
Pincho says...
I first posted about these physics many years ago, I can quickly find something...
Kissing Problem
That was taken from AVForums, and searching AVForums could take a long time, so I'll skip it. But the physics are to do with gravity colliding at points to create magnetic out-flows, and because points all meet from holes the physics are the same as Kissing Number Problems of same sized sphere, or circles, or torus. It proposed that the kissing numbers would create fractals, and fractals would create a froth that would build a galaxy, and the froth would ultimately create all of nature, and this is due to a alternating areas of least resistance. The 13th ball of a 3D kissing number problem is divided around a Icosahedron shaped structure, and the way that it fits creates Chaos, and that Chaos creates all physics... every particle. So that's about it.
Pincho Paxton
What are nanostars in 2-D superconductor supposed to mean?
Pincho says...
I first posted about these physics many years ago, I can quickly find something...
Kissing Problem
That was taken from AVForums, and searching AVForums could take a long time, so I'll skip it. But the physics are to do with gravity colliding at points to create magnetic out-flows, and because points all meet from holes the physics are the same as Kissing Number Problems of same sized sphere, or circles, or torus. It proposed that the kissing numbers would create fractals, and fractals would create a froth that would build a galaxy, and the froth would ultimately create all of nature, and this is due to a alternating areas of least resistance. The 13th ball of a 3D kissing number problem is divided around a Icosahedron shaped structure, and the way that it fits creates Chaos, and that Chaos creates all physics... every particle. So that's about it.
Pincho Paxton