Post by Pincho Paxton on Jun 12, 2016 11:05:40 GMT
Link...
THE MISTRUST OF SCIENCE
Pincho says...
Scientists are often wrong, because they act religiously towards their peers... Einstein, Newton, and they are bred to believe their theories which are inducted through literature at an early stage. The very first page of the standard Calculus book that Richard Feynman read introduces you to time. Time doesn't exist, so on your first day of calculus you are already infected with an untruth. This sets you up to follow a string of mistakes leading to the Big Bang, and General Relativity. It is hard to avoid all of the mistakes without totally avoiding science completely, and just start from scratch, that's what I did! The first thing that I did was work out the physics for gravity, and then I worked outwards towards magnetism, then quantum physics leading towards physics, all in a nice neat order. My brain therefore has a timeline stored in the order that it was created, and you do not get a big bang. You get gravity flowing inwards, and magnetism flowing outwards, and gravity changing into magnetism, and magnetism changing back into gravity, it's a spherical conveyor belt. The red shift is therefore a part of this conveyor system.
What this all means is that the beginning of science is wrong, which by cause, and effect leads to everything being wrong.
If nothing in science can be trusted then the above link in favour of science is a part of the problem, because it cherry picks the evidence for science in the exact same way that it uses as examples of the opposite.
Pincho Paxton
THE MISTRUST OF SCIENCE
Pincho says...
Scientists are often wrong, because they act religiously towards their peers... Einstein, Newton, and they are bred to believe their theories which are inducted through literature at an early stage. The very first page of the standard Calculus book that Richard Feynman read introduces you to time. Time doesn't exist, so on your first day of calculus you are already infected with an untruth. This sets you up to follow a string of mistakes leading to the Big Bang, and General Relativity. It is hard to avoid all of the mistakes without totally avoiding science completely, and just start from scratch, that's what I did! The first thing that I did was work out the physics for gravity, and then I worked outwards towards magnetism, then quantum physics leading towards physics, all in a nice neat order. My brain therefore has a timeline stored in the order that it was created, and you do not get a big bang. You get gravity flowing inwards, and magnetism flowing outwards, and gravity changing into magnetism, and magnetism changing back into gravity, it's a spherical conveyor belt. The red shift is therefore a part of this conveyor system.
What this all means is that the beginning of science is wrong, which by cause, and effect leads to everything being wrong.
If nothing in science can be trusted then the above link in favour of science is a part of the problem, because it cherry picks the evidence for science in the exact same way that it uses as examples of the opposite.
Pincho Paxton