Post by Pincho Paxton on Mar 19, 2014 11:57:01 GMT
Link...
How do we know the Big Bang actually happened?
Pincho says...
None of this is evidence for a Big Bang. The examples work just the same for steady state. Water turns to clouds, the clouds appear to be moving away from us, but they return as rain. Galaxies moving apart are part of a cycle. The cycle opens up areas for new galaxies to begin a new cycle. Like all conveyor belts point away from us, and yet conveyor belts don't go anywhere. There was no Big Bang, everything is in a cycle.
So we don't know that the Big Bang actually happened. What I do know is that the physics for the Big Bang are impossible. You can't have everything start off at a point. The physics of the Universe do not allow this to happen. It breaks several rules...
1/ It creates a rule that energy overlapping needs no equal counterforce. That breaks Newtons 3rd law.
2/ It creates a Paradox that time has a beginning, and the Universe has to begin without a time, or beginning.
3/ It creates a special area in the Universe, the middle of expansion, where no special area should exist.
4/ It turns a 3D structure into a flat space structure, which doesn't make any logical sense.
5/ It creates an energy paradox where energy is not a substance, but has location, beginning, and end, which makes it a substance.
6/ It means that the Universe has a void, no physics to work with Gravity. If you allow a void, you allow a God. If you allow energy without substance you allow a God, and if you allow a beginning you allow a God. This makes the Big Bang a religion.
7/ Most of the actual physics for the Big Bang are created from words in the English language. Pull forces are words that do not exist. Bending of spacetime.. words that have no real physics in 3D. Relativity.. words without the real physics. Singularity.. time... the beginning... energy as 4 forces... are all words with no physics.
8/ Most of real observation is ignored. We see 3D structures. We see waves made from particles. We see push forces not pull forces. We see a cyclic environment. We see particles moving towards points, we see gravity moving particles towards points. We see that we are not on a flat space.
9/ We see black holes producing atoms, and we see the sun creating water. We don't need the singularity.
What we need is a cycle. A cycle that produces everything that we see. Gravity is infinite, but has gaps created by its grain structure so it can move apart, this creates open space. Open space fills with virtual particles made from tachyons. Tachyons spin in holes to produce photons, and electrons. Gravity with photons inside it creates internal pressure. The pressure creates external force. External force creates the bump force. the bump force creates holes. Holes create bonding through stringing.
etc...etc.
The thing is that I am using the same evidence posted in the link. I am using the same evidence more intelligently. I work like Sherlock Holmes. I take all of the evidence, and use it in the best way. Over the years thousands of experiments have led to my theory. Ignored experiments like the Michelson/Morley experiment are the most interesting. It is ignored yet it showed us how to make gravity work. It showed us that there is no Aether wind, and so if there is an Aether you need physics that are not transmitted outwardly. That's a big clue for a physicist. Nobody even bothered to work it out...
You have the Big bang because nobody bothered to work things out. I worked things out as best as I can. The Big Bang is an insult to the Human Race.
Pincho Paxton
How do we know the Big Bang actually happened?
Pincho says...
None of this is evidence for a Big Bang. The examples work just the same for steady state. Water turns to clouds, the clouds appear to be moving away from us, but they return as rain. Galaxies moving apart are part of a cycle. The cycle opens up areas for new galaxies to begin a new cycle. Like all conveyor belts point away from us, and yet conveyor belts don't go anywhere. There was no Big Bang, everything is in a cycle.
So we don't know that the Big Bang actually happened. What I do know is that the physics for the Big Bang are impossible. You can't have everything start off at a point. The physics of the Universe do not allow this to happen. It breaks several rules...
1/ It creates a rule that energy overlapping needs no equal counterforce. That breaks Newtons 3rd law.
2/ It creates a Paradox that time has a beginning, and the Universe has to begin without a time, or beginning.
3/ It creates a special area in the Universe, the middle of expansion, where no special area should exist.
4/ It turns a 3D structure into a flat space structure, which doesn't make any logical sense.
5/ It creates an energy paradox where energy is not a substance, but has location, beginning, and end, which makes it a substance.
6/ It means that the Universe has a void, no physics to work with Gravity. If you allow a void, you allow a God. If you allow energy without substance you allow a God, and if you allow a beginning you allow a God. This makes the Big Bang a religion.
7/ Most of the actual physics for the Big Bang are created from words in the English language. Pull forces are words that do not exist. Bending of spacetime.. words that have no real physics in 3D. Relativity.. words without the real physics. Singularity.. time... the beginning... energy as 4 forces... are all words with no physics.
8/ Most of real observation is ignored. We see 3D structures. We see waves made from particles. We see push forces not pull forces. We see a cyclic environment. We see particles moving towards points, we see gravity moving particles towards points. We see that we are not on a flat space.
9/ We see black holes producing atoms, and we see the sun creating water. We don't need the singularity.
What we need is a cycle. A cycle that produces everything that we see. Gravity is infinite, but has gaps created by its grain structure so it can move apart, this creates open space. Open space fills with virtual particles made from tachyons. Tachyons spin in holes to produce photons, and electrons. Gravity with photons inside it creates internal pressure. The pressure creates external force. External force creates the bump force. the bump force creates holes. Holes create bonding through stringing.
etc...etc.
The thing is that I am using the same evidence posted in the link. I am using the same evidence more intelligently. I work like Sherlock Holmes. I take all of the evidence, and use it in the best way. Over the years thousands of experiments have led to my theory. Ignored experiments like the Michelson/Morley experiment are the most interesting. It is ignored yet it showed us how to make gravity work. It showed us that there is no Aether wind, and so if there is an Aether you need physics that are not transmitted outwardly. That's a big clue for a physicist. Nobody even bothered to work it out...
You have the Big bang because nobody bothered to work things out. I worked things out as best as I can. The Big Bang is an insult to the Human Race.
Pincho Paxton