Post by Pincho Paxton on Aug 19, 2014 12:36:29 GMT
Link...
The Universe Parallel Universes Clip 1
Pincho says...
Karl Pilkington posted this, and I'm a fan of his, so I thought I would mention it. Although these science videos often annoy me, because they are based on faulty maths. There is the Parallel Universe in other dimensions which shares the same space as our Universe... that might make sense in maths, but maths isn't physics. It is hard to propagate energy through a structure that shares another structure without the energy propagating through both structures. Dimensions seem to be a fault in science, I should probably find the fault and then rip dimensions out of the maths book. Real dimensions are fractals through a grain stacking system... Like your Computer Monitor. A Computer Monitor is made up of Pixels, and each pixel is surrounded by 8 more pixels. With an old digital joystick you had 8 directions to move from a pixel... that makes a square, 1 pixel surrounded by 8. That's what a dimension is in physics... not maths. The Universe is a grain stacking system, and I think that you get 12 directions from a location in Quantum Physics. So that is your dimensions for the Universe... not really X/Y/Z. You can use X/Y/Z because the dimensions are so small that they appear smooth... like X/Y/Z... but they are grainy. Time is just a loop that forms in the propagation pattern. It's all a fractal, and time is to do with the fractal contracting into holes.
The Multiverse can be bubbles far apart, but not so likely parallel. Inflation is not likely, because inflation is upstream like a salmon swimming up a waterfall. You need energy for inflation, but contraction is into the area of least resistance, so contraction is the most likely form that the Universe takes. You can get a red shift from contraction, because the contraction makes things appear to move apart. You deflate a bunch of balloons, and they move apart. The distance between galaxies stretches out the waves of light as the galaxies contract... you see these mathematical mistakes?
Why isn't it likely that there is a parallel Universe? Another mistake in the maths. It is taken that infinity will produce a repeat Universe. In the video they say a GooglePlex Yards. But if you travel a googleplex yards you now have to repeat a Googleplex yards of information to get the same physics as before. As you can imagine the repeat Universe now becomes far less likely. It is probably cancelled out completely.
So I get annoyed, because I am just an artist, and these guys are supposed to be the mathematicians. Why am I seeing the mistakes, and not them?
The Universe Parallel Universes Clip 1
Pincho says...
Karl Pilkington posted this, and I'm a fan of his, so I thought I would mention it. Although these science videos often annoy me, because they are based on faulty maths. There is the Parallel Universe in other dimensions which shares the same space as our Universe... that might make sense in maths, but maths isn't physics. It is hard to propagate energy through a structure that shares another structure without the energy propagating through both structures. Dimensions seem to be a fault in science, I should probably find the fault and then rip dimensions out of the maths book. Real dimensions are fractals through a grain stacking system... Like your Computer Monitor. A Computer Monitor is made up of Pixels, and each pixel is surrounded by 8 more pixels. With an old digital joystick you had 8 directions to move from a pixel... that makes a square, 1 pixel surrounded by 8. That's what a dimension is in physics... not maths. The Universe is a grain stacking system, and I think that you get 12 directions from a location in Quantum Physics. So that is your dimensions for the Universe... not really X/Y/Z. You can use X/Y/Z because the dimensions are so small that they appear smooth... like X/Y/Z... but they are grainy. Time is just a loop that forms in the propagation pattern. It's all a fractal, and time is to do with the fractal contracting into holes.
The Multiverse can be bubbles far apart, but not so likely parallel. Inflation is not likely, because inflation is upstream like a salmon swimming up a waterfall. You need energy for inflation, but contraction is into the area of least resistance, so contraction is the most likely form that the Universe takes. You can get a red shift from contraction, because the contraction makes things appear to move apart. You deflate a bunch of balloons, and they move apart. The distance between galaxies stretches out the waves of light as the galaxies contract... you see these mathematical mistakes?
Why isn't it likely that there is a parallel Universe? Another mistake in the maths. It is taken that infinity will produce a repeat Universe. In the video they say a GooglePlex Yards. But if you travel a googleplex yards you now have to repeat a Googleplex yards of information to get the same physics as before. As you can imagine the repeat Universe now becomes far less likely. It is probably cancelled out completely.
So I get annoyed, because I am just an artist, and these guys are supposed to be the mathematicians. Why am I seeing the mistakes, and not them?