Science is a Religion

There's a lot more maths that needs reversing too. When is anyone going to notice that? F needs reversing, because in my theory Mass is not the cause of the forces. Mass is the flow force, and the flow is into negative mass which means that F requires negative values like Negative mass would replace M1, and M2. Then you add the flow force. Then you also require the cosmological constant to equalise the flow force so that G is a constant by equalisation. Equalisation also means that Gravity can change unnoticed. So you then have maths that accounts for Dark Matter. Dark matter is the constant of equalisation of flow force into holes in spacetime. Mass now has numbers which work more like 6,5,4,3,2,1,0,-1, -2, -3, -4 ,-5, -6, and that is the constant. So now you have the electron as a negative mass hole, and the energy as the flow force into the negative mass hole. And a positron is something that fits into the hole of an electron. Scale is important, and 'touching the sides' has some importance for feedback. You collide if you 'touch the sides' and something about digital step distances means that only collisions that touch the sides occur. It's hard to get your head around digital step distances, they have something to do with a fractal, and a ratio. But space is not smooth.

This all eliminates the Big Bang, because my flow is in the opposite direction. I would have a flow towards the singularity, and then away from the singularity as inertia, and scale change. I would simply have a black hole at the centre of a Galaxy as my singularity. That's all I would need. The particles are then created by collisions with space itself at high speed. But you can bet that all of my ideas will eventually be used, and the news will be...

Einstein was right!